• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Blocks to Creativity in a Freshmen Engineering Course Using Design Heuristic Cues

Undergraduate #104
Discipline: Science and Mathematics Education
Subcategory: Education

Bethany Fronhofer - Wentworth Institute of Technology
Co-Author(s): Sarah Schott, Louisiana State University, LA Maria Manuela Valladares and Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University, UT



In response to a national report to the President to increase the number of engineering graduates by 1 million in the year 2025, researchers have begun to explore the stumbling blocks for engineering learning and persistence. One identified block is how students’ transition from novice to experts upon execution of engineering design projects as the literature suggests that oftentimes students are incapable of making decisions, overcoming confidence barriers and acquiring the motivation to think of solutions that differ from existing ideas. In the latter, the field of design heuristics (DH) has been studied as a potential area of research to promote problem-solving skills in students. In 2009, Yilmaz and Seifert summarized the results of outcomes from studies done with industrial and engineering designers at varying expertise levels. The result was set seventy-seven cards that introduced different approaches to engineering design problems. Traditionally DH cards have been used to improve instruction, however, our research team believes that the cards can be used along with other instruments as a comprehensive research approach to identify stumbling blocks for engineering students tackling engineering design projects. The research hypothesis for this work was that identification of creative solutions in engineering student projects is blocked by adaptive and perceptual factors. Research was done on 88 freshmen engineering students, who were given a service learning design problem related to creating an efficient assembly process that would promote jobs for Down syndrome employees. Three experimental conditions were controlled: a set of students received DH cards related to their design problem (Positive); a set of students received DH cards not related to their design problem (Negative), and a control group. It was found that the use of design heuristic cards at the start of the project, initially increased creativity in engineering students regardless of the cards used. However, as the semester progressed, creativity was highest in the positive group compared to the negative card condition and the control. Closer examination of blocks showed that perceptual (ability to see the end goal of the project) and communicative (ability to communicate design ideas) deterred student performances on their projects. Future research questions will explore the role these cards had on self-efficacy (confidence in one’s ability) during execution of the project.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): I thank M. M. Valladares and I. Villanueva for their constant support. I also thank N. Fang, O. Lawanto and W. Goodridge for their insight. Funding was provided by an NSF/HBCU-UP to N. Fang and O. Lawanto and a Utah State University SEED Grant to I. Villanueva. This material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE 1262806.

Faculty Advisor: Idalis Villanueva,

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science