• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Room Temperature Fetal Magnetocardiography using Optically Pumped Magnetometers

Graduate #93
Discipline: Physics
Subcategory: Physics (not Nanoscience)

Margo A. Batie - University of Wisconsin-Madison
Co-Author(s): Sarah Bitant, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI



Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG), the magnetic analog of ECG, is a technique used to detect fetal arrhythmias and monitor fetal well-being. The current standard for fMCG, is a cryogenically cooled device called a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Recent advancements in quantum sensing have led to the development of optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs), magnetic field sensors that operate at room temperature with comparable sensitive to that of SQUIDs. OPMs offer decreased sensor size, increased flexibility of sensor placement, and lower cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of an OPM-based fMCG system versus a SQUID-based system. Fetal MCG signals were recorded using each system individually, in a magnetically shielded room, then performance was compared based on various performance parameters such as signal-to-noise ratios. The signal measured by the OPMs was on average a factor of 2 lower than the fetal heart signal measured by the SQUID. This likely due to the OPMs being configured as magnetometers, as opposed to gradiometers, making them more susceptible to environmental interference than the SQUID. With further research into more effective noise suppression and crosstalk reduction techniques, OPMs have the potential to be a cheaper alternative to current instrumentation without compromising sensitivity.
References: Boto E, Bowtell R, Krüger P, Fromhold TM, Morris PG, Meyer SS, et al. (2016) On the Potential of a New Generation of Magnetometers for MEG: A Beamformer Simulation Study. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0157655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157655 Yu SH, Wakai RT. Maternal mcg interference cancellation using splined independent component subtraction. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2011;vol. 58(no. 10):2835–2843.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): This study is funded through NIH grant R01 HL063174 and R44 HL114182.

Faculty Advisor: Ronald Wakai, rtwakai@wisc.edu

Role: -data acquisition -data processing

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science