• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Project Team
    • Advisory Board
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • 2023 ERN Recap Video
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

The Roles of Self-efficacy, Interests, and Expectations in Predicting Career Persistence for Undergraduate African American Biology Majors

Graduate #108
Discipline: Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences
Subcategory: Social Sciences/Psychology/Economics

David W. Shelton - Tennessee State University


African American (AA) students are under-represented in STEM (National Science Foundation, 2015), largely due to poor career persistence (National Science Foundation, 2014). Career development theories may provide a framework for interventions for improving STEM career persistence for AA students. One popular career development theory, Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994), claims that career development is affected by a number of factors such as interests, self-efficacy, and expectations. However, current career theories may not fully account for AA students’ career development (Bingham & Fouad, 1997).The purpose of the current study is to determine how well some factors of SCCT predict the persistence of biology majors at a historically black university. Participants (n = 280) consisted of undergraduate biology majors at a historically black university in the Southeastern US. Each participant was provided measures of STEM/technology interests, STEM/coping self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and persistence (Lent et al., 2003). Demographics information was also collected. Data was analyzed via stepwise multiple regression, with steps adding (in order) outcome expectations, self-efficacy, and interests. Outcome expectations [R2 = .094, p < .001], self-efficacy [R2 = .161, p < .001], and interests [R2 = .180, p < .05] each significantly contributed to the model predicting persistence. However, expectations and self-efficacy accounted for much more of the variance (9 percent and 7 percent, respectively) than interests (2 percent). Results suggest that outcome expectations and self-efficacy may serve as important areas of intervention for improving biology career persistence for AA students. Further research examining improvements in these areas and related improvements in STEM retention for AA students is warranted. References: Fouad, N. A. & Bingham, R. P. (1995). Career counseling with racial and ethnic minorities. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pg. 331-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unified social cognitive theory of career/academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior [Monograph], 45, 79-122. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 458-465. National Science Foundation. (2014). Higher education in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/chapter-2/chapter-2.pdf National Science Foundation. (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/tables.cfm

Funder Acknowledgement(s): This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1238778. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Faculty Advisor: Marie S. Hammond, mhammond1@tnstate.edu

Role: Analysis/interpretation of results, research writing.

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science