• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Candidate Trees for Terrestrial CO2 Storage in Regions with High Air Pollution and High Water Stress

Undergraduate #270
Discipline: Ecology Environmental and Earth Sciences
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering

Sandra Ponce - Taft College
Co-Author(s): Dayanand Saini



The State of California has now passed a new law to reduce, greenhouse gas (GHG), emissions by 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050. A significant portion (37%) of GHG emissions in California comes from mobile sources (i.e. various modes of transportations). Terrestrial CO2 storage (i.e. taking the advantage of inherent ability of certain tree species for storing carbon) for reducing the concentration of CO2, which is major GHG, from atmosphere is one of many ways to tackle the problem of GHG emissions resulting from mobile sources. In this project we focused on finding good candidate trees that are drought resistant, native to California, and could continue to sequester high amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide over an extended period (hundreds of years) of time. We used several forestry databases for gathering a list of 37 candidate trees. Based on drought resistance of each of the candidate trees, the list was further narrowed downed to 14. For the screened trees, pounds of carbon dioxide stored per year were calculated using the publicly available methods. One of the trees that was evaluated is the Ginkgo Biloba tree. It was found that this tree, on average, will sequester 747 pounds of carbon dioxide per year. This California native tree is drought tolerant, and can live for up to 3,000 years. This tree can adapt itself to polluted areas which would be great for regions like the San Joaquin Valley which is not only facing serious air pollution problem but also is one of the high water stress regions in California. When looking for candidate tree species, other factors were also considered. In cases of the California Buckeye tree and the Armstrong pine tree, both appeared great candidates however California Buckeye is poisonous to honey bees, whereas, Armstrong Pine’s dry leaves are dangerous to horses. Such factors may have unintended consequences of adopting terrestrial CO2 storage as an effective mean for combating GHG emissions resulting from mobile sources. The future work will be focused on performing initial calculation for the need of trees per acre and the planting acreage that could be able to make a difference in abating the GHG emissions causing from transportation sector.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): This project is supported by the NSF CREST Grant awarded to California State University Bakersfield.

Faculty Advisor: Dayanand Saini, dsaini@csub.edu

Role: I did all of the research listed in this abstract. I created a list of trees that met the requirements for this project. I researched and found the Carbon sequestration calculation and applied it to the list of qualified tree species, determined which would be great candidates and I also reviewed AB 32 and the GHG reports.

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science