• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Polymorphic Protection Hypothesis Not Supported in the Bunchgrass Lizard, Sceloporus slevini

Undergraduate #14
Discipline: Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Ecology

Dallas Davidson - Virginia State University


Pattern polymorphism, the presence of two or more patterns (morphs) within a species, serves as a model system for testing hypotheses in evolution and ecology. Research on polymorphism is important in its broad scope and the implications for species survival. For example, the “polymorphic protection hypothesis” proposes that pattern polymorphism decreases predation by visual predators on the more cryptic pattern. However, despite the potential advantage of pattern polymorphism to a species, of the 97 species of ectothermic spiny lizards (Sceloporus spp.), only Slevin’s Bunchgrass lizard, Sceloporus slevini, exhibits pattern polymorphism. We tested the polymorphic protection hypothesis, positing that the unicolor pattern (lacks dorsal pattern of spotting) provides a greater degree of cryptic coloration and is thus less vulnerable to predation than the regular pattern. To test this hypothesis we examined individuals from three populations of S. slevini in southeastern Arizona. Data recorded for each individual were: GPS location, sex, snout-vent length to nearest 0.01 mm, pattern (regular or unicolor) and tail autonomy (breakage). Tail autonomy is one indicator of predation pressure in lizards. We used paired T-tests to examine if significant differences existed between body sizes of the morphs. Chi-square tests were used to test intra-population comparisons of size and tail autonomy. Data were collected from 349 lizards. Regular patterned individuals made up 80% of the captures, while unicolor individuals represented 20%. There was no significant size differences between morphs. The percentage of tail autonomy between morphs and sexes showed no significant difference. In conclusion, we found no support for the polymorphic protection hypothesis. Future research will focus on the role of female mate choice between morphs, determining the genetic basis for pattern polymorphism and exploring the role of pattern polymorphism in species survival under increasing environmental temperatures.

References: Anderson, J.D. 1972. Pattern polymorphism in the Bunch-grass lizards, Sceloporus scalaris slevini. Journal of Herpetology 6:80.
Forsman, A., J. Ahnesjo, S. Caesar and M. Karlsson. 2008. A model of ecological and evolutionary consequences of color polymorphism. Ecology 89:34-40.
Karpestam, E., S. Merilaita and A. Forsman. 2014. Natural levels of colour polymorphism reduce performance of visual predators searching for camouflaged prey. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112:546-555.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): We thank D. Hardy, A. Harris, and A. White for help in the field. L. Kennedy at the Audubon Appleton-Whittell Research Ranch and the Southwestern research Station of the New York Museum of Natural History provided logistic support. This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation HBCU-UP to Dr. Christian d'Orgeix, Department of Biology, Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA 23806.

Faculty Advisor: Christian d'Orgeix,

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science