• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Closing the Loop: An Evaluation Process for Improvement of Intervention Design with Application

Faculty #75
Discipline: Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
Subcategory: STEM Research
- Tennessee State University
Co-Author(s): Elaine Martin, Tom Broyles, Martez Burks, David Shelton and Susan Githua, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN



Designing an intervention based upon research literature is the first step towards improvement process. Rarely does an intervention work the way we intend at this point. Thus, revision to increase the effectiveness of the intervention is critical. Based in the theory of continuous quality improvement and using a combination of consultative, evaluative, and educational review processes, this poster will report on the procedures used and outcome of such a review process. Attention to differences between the current context and the context of the research base and literature will be articulated to further clarify the critical nature of evaluation in the improvement of processes and interventions included in grant-funded research. An example using the intervention sequence being developed across two recent HBCU-UP BPR grants awarded this group of researchers will be included.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): National Science Foundation, HBCU-UP Broadening Participation Research

Faculty Advisor: None Listed,

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science