• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Effect of Flow on Bacterial Endocarditis

Undergraduate #325
Discipline: Technology and Engineering
Subcategory: Biomedical Engineering

Jamie Nunez - University of Washington
Co-Author(s): Wendy Thomas, Olga Yakovenko, and Jasmine Hawkins, University of Washington, Seattle, WA



Bacterial endocarditis is an infection on the inner lining of the heart. Even though this disease has been studied for decades, there is still not much known about this complex disease. We hypothesize that flow conditions play a critical role in the initiation and progression of bacterial endocarditis. In the heart, flow is pulsatile, meaning that the flow oscillates between two different flow rates. This could allow bacteria to bind in times of low flow and then stay attached when the flow increases once again; however, this has often been ignored or deemed insignificant. Scientists will often use constant flow rather than pulsatile to study these types of bacteria and their adhesive properties. In order to test our hypothesis, we first started with a parallel flow chamber to ensure that we can get a response time, the time it takes for a particular system to respond to an input, low enough to mimic a heart beating 60 times per second. A low response time is important since rapidly changing flow rates may not give our device enough time to reach the maximum and minimum flow rate desired. To lower the response time, the set up for our system, including tubing, a syringe pump, syringe, and flow chamber, was altered. We then used Particle Imaging Velocimetry to analyze the response time and how it was changed by these alterations. So far, we have achieved a response time of about 0.3 seconds, which allows us to simulate a heart beating 15 times per minute. We then tested how Streptococcus gordonii, a strain of bacteria that is known to cause bacterial endocarditis, bound in constant and pulsatile flow with this set up and found that the two conditions caused almost equal amounts of bacteria to bind. Also, binding was still present for both conditions in the high shear stresses present in the heart, 2-8 Pa. This data shows that, while pulsatile flow does not cause more adhesion than constant flow, it does not cause less binding, either. To further evaluate this data and its physiological relevance, we will continue to lower the response time to better simulate what happens in the heart. Once this is accomplished, we can again study S. gordonii’s adhesive properties and draw further conclusions.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): This research was funded by National Institute of Health (1R01 AI106987-01), NASA Space Grant, LSAMP, the University of Washington GenOM Project (NIH 5R25HG007153-03), a gracious donation from Dr. Anne Dinning and Dr. Michael Wolf, and the Genentech Foundation.

Faculty Advisor: Wendy Thomas, wendyt@uw.edu

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science