• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

ERN: Emerging Researchers National Conference in STEM

  • About
    • About AAAS
    • About the NSF
    • About the Conference
    • Partners/Supporters
    • Project Team
  • Conference
  • Abstracts
    • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
    • Graduate Abstract Locator
    • Abstract Submission Process
    • Presentation Schedules
    • Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • Presentation Guidelines
  • Travel Awards
  • Resources
    • Award Winners
    • Code of Conduct-AAAS Meetings
    • Code of Conduct-ERN Conference
    • Conference Agenda
    • Conference Materials
    • Conference Program Books
    • ERN Photo Galleries
    • Events | Opportunities
    • Exhibitor Info
    • HBCU-UP/CREST PI/PD Meeting
    • In the News
    • NSF Harassment Policy
    • Plenary Session Videos
    • Professional Development
    • Science Careers Handbook
    • Additional Resources
    • Archives
  • Engage
    • Webinars
    • ERN 10-Year Anniversary Videos
    • Plenary Session Videos
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Investigation of Calcination Temperature on Porous CaFe2O4 Anodes

Graduate #29
Discipline: Nanoscience or Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Science
Session: 1
Room: Forum

Jacob Strimaitis - Norfolk State University
Co-Author(s): Samuel Danquah, Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA; Clifford Denize, Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA; Sangram K. Pradhan, Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA; Messaoud Bahoura, Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA



Porous CaFe2O4 (pCFO), a promising conversion-type anode material for next-generation lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and hybrid supercapacitors (HSCs), is relatively easy to produce via solution combustion synthesis (SCS). Fully calcined pCFO also shows formidable electrochemical performance compared to industry-standard graphite and classic conversion-type Fe2O3. However, the effects of post-synthesis calcination temperatures on pCFO have not been thoroughly investigated. Herein, we demonstrate that pCFO produced via SCS and calcined to various temperatures shows remarkable differences in morphology and composition. When assembled in coin cells for electrochemical analysis, pCFO shows a tradeoff in capacity and durability with temperature: pCFO samples heated to moderately-high temperatures (i.e., 500 ⁰C and 700 ⁰C) achieve high capacities during relatively short rate performance tests but experience significant drops in capacity between 20-150 subsequent charge-discharge cycles, whereas pCFO heated to full calcination (i.e., 900 ⁰C) shows moderate capacities in its rate performance test but comparatively stable capacities across 500 subsequent charge-discharge cycles. This study highlights the importance of calcination temperature in anode materials preparation, with implications for future improvements when implemented in LIBs and HSCs.

Funder Acknowledgement(s): This work is supported by the NSF-CREST Grant number HRD 1547771 and NSF-CREST Grant number HRD 1036494.

Faculty Advisor: Professor Messaoud Bahoura, mbahoura@nsu.edu

Role: 95+% of all components, including idea generation, experimental design/setup, experimental running, data collection/analysis, and presentation drafting.

Sidebar

Abstract Locators

  • Undergraduate Abstract Locator
  • Graduate Abstract Locator

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DUE-1930047. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

1200 New York Ave, NW
Washington,DC 20005
202-326-6400
Contact Us
About Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

The World’s Largest General Scientific Society

Useful Links

  • Membership
  • Careers at AAAS
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Focus Areas

  • Science Education
  • Science Diplomacy
  • Public Engagement
  • Careers in STEM

Focus Areas

  • Shaping Science Policy
  • Advocacy for Evidence
  • R&D Budget Analysis
  • Human Rights, Ethics & Law

© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science